My partner runs the day-to-day and I can't get the numbers. Every question gets 'it's complicated'. I own 40% and know less than the bookkeeper does.
When co-founder talks break down, you need a structured next conversation — not a court filing.
A structured read of the conflict's business logic — contributions, earnings, control, dividend policy — ending in a settlement framework, or a lawyer-ready brief if escalation is unavoidable. Confidential by default.
Response within 24 hours · one-sided and confidential
“Estonian law supports private settlement. Court is an option — not the only option.”
Three conflicts we see — calmly, weekly.
One partner draws a salary, a car, and 'representation expenses'. The other waits for dividends that never come. The company funds one lifestyle.
My co-founder stopped answering six weeks ago. The investor wants resolution before the next round. Court feels premature — doing nothing feels worse.
What the Review is — and deliberately is not.
Before the sessionConfidential intake
One side of the story, structured: contributions, roles, money flows, the agreements that exist — or don't. No names required at first contact.
Day 190-minute analysis
The conflict's business logic: who put in what, who earns what, who controls what — and where the leverage actually sits.
Within 48hFramework or brief
A settlement framework with negotiation talking points — or, where escalation is unavoidable, a lawyer-ready brief that saves five to ten paid hours.
If both sides agreeMediation option
A separate engagement with Sulev as neutral facilitator. Only with both partners' consent — the Review itself stays one-sided.
We are not a law firm and we do not represent either side in court. Where litigation is the right path, we coordinate with partner attorneys — HansaLaw and others — whom you pay directly; the brief from this Review becomes their starting file.

Sulev Pikker
Founding PartnerIn business since 1991 — entrepreneur, trainer, and mentor. That practice includes partner-conflict mediation and the quiet settlements that never reach a courtroom. Every Review runs through Sulev personally.
One fixed price — and a path if both sides want out.
One-sided by design, confidential by default. Prepaid by card or SEPA invoice; the confidential intake arrives right after booking.
A facilitated settlement with Sulev as neutral facilitator — separate ground rules, scoped after the Review, agreed in writing, and only with both partners' consent.
If this is really a legal-first matter, we say so before the session — and refund. See the exact price on the pricing page
Asked quietly, answered plainly.
ConfidentialityWill my partner know I came to you?
No. The Review is one-sided and confidential by default; NDA on request. If mediation later makes sense, any contact with the other side happens only with your explicit go-ahead.
SidesCan you represent both of us?
The Review is deliberately one-sided. If both partners want a neutral process, that is mediation — a separate engagement with different ground rules, which Sulev can facilitate.
LawyersDo I still need a lawyer?
Possibly — and if so, you'll arrive with a brief that saves paid hours. Estonian law favors private settlement; most conflicts we see resolve without a courtroom.
OutcomeWhat if my position turns out to be weak?
Then you'll hear it plainly, with numbers. Knowing your leverage before negotiating is the point — overplaying a weak hand is how owners lose companies.
LanguageCan we do this in Russian or Estonian?
Yes. The session and the written deliverable come in English, Estonian, or Russian — your choice.
SilenceWhat if my partner will not engage at all?
Then the Review still gives you the one-sided map: your leverage, your options, and the sequence — including what to do while the other side stays silent. Many next conversations start from exactly that map.